22/10/2013 1:00am
> From the WeatherWatch archives
There is “absolutely” a link between climate change and wildfires, U.N. Climate Chief Christiana Figueres told CNN’s Christiane Amanpour on Monday.
Wildfires are raging in a ring around Sydney, Australia, as that country experiences its hottest year on record.
“The World Meteorological Organization has not established a direct link between this wildfire and climate change – yet,” Figueres said. “But what is absolutely clear is the science is telling us that there are increasing heat waves in Asia, Europe, and Australia; that there these will continue; that they will continue in their intensity and in their frequency.”
Australia’s new prime minister, Tony Abbott, has expressed deep scepticism about climate change, once even calling it “absolute c**p” (he has since walked those remarks back).
Abbott is trying to get rid of Australia’s carbon tax and has dissolved its climate change commission.
“What the new government in Australia has not done is it has not walked away from its international commitment on climate change,” Figueres told Amanpour. “So what they’re struggling with now is not what are they going to do, but how are they going to get there.”
The U.N. climate chief said that she believed the Australian government would pay a very high political and economic price for straying from the path established by the previous Labor government.
“We are really already paying the price of carbon,” Figueres said. “We are paying the price with wildfires, we are paying the price with droughts.”
Proponents, Figueres included, believe that it is only by putting a tax on carbon – on fossil fuels – that the true cost of energy, taking into account the effect on the environment, can be reflected.
“We have very little time,” she said. “The important thing is that we still have time, although inasmuch as we delay, we are closing the window upon ourselves.”
Right now, Figueres said, emissions are still rising; humankind has to get past peak emissions by the end of the decade, she said, so that zero net emissions can be achieved by the second half of the 21st century.
“What we have seen are just introductions to the doom and gloom that we could be facing. But that’s not the only scenario,” she told Amanpour. “We could – as humankind – we could take vigorous action and we could have a very, very different scenario. That’s a scenario that is worth examining.”
– Picture: CNN
– CNN
Before you add a new comment, take note this story was published on 22 Oct 2013.
Add new comment
Peter of Dunedin on 24/10/2013 6:22am
It’s a “no-brainer”. Of course there must be a link in the earlier and longer bush fire season and climate change. The world scientific body in unison are continually reminding us of the consequences of climate change which is continually and being monitored and studied.
It astounds me that the ” Luddites” continue to be given so much space and attention.
I think it is time for WeatherWatch to take a more responsible position and point out such salient facts.
The anti – brigade are but a vociferous tiny minority who are getting attention far beyond what they deserve!
Reply
Alan on 23/10/2013 6:51pm
And on the same point. Can the “Climate Change Gurus” tell me why there is more ice than ever in the Antarctic over the past 2 years than there ever has been???
I hear they have no explanation of this! I wonder why?
Reply
Guest on 23/10/2013 10:52pm
They have had to admit there has been no global warming for nearly 17 years. None of their models predicted that, so their models are now ‘out the window’ … they have also had to admit that the consensus that they try to tell us with 95% confidence is 97% of all scientists.
It now turns out, on a careful measurement by their own side, to be 0.3% of all the 11,944 scientific papers, and then using this to prove there was a consensus, and that most of the warming since 1950 was caused by us!
According to my calculations that’s about 35.7 papers out of 11,944 scientific papers – what trickery and deceptiveness, in the name of science, and to call it a ‘consensus’ !
Reply
Guest on 22/10/2013 2:33am
Someone should tell the U.N. Climate Chief, Kommisar Christiana Figueres that bushfires are natural events (except for those started by arsonists etc), and to link the bushfire disasters in N.S.W. to climate change is absolute nonsense.
Global warming/climate change is a gradual process which doesn’t explain major bushfires.
The idea that every fire is a bad fire, ignores the fact that in the Australian context you need fire to keep the bush healthy and safe, and since 1915, when records were first kept, major fires had occurred every 10 to 20 years ( before anyone ever thought of the idea of global warming/climate change!).
Reducing the fuel loads in the Australian bush in N.S.W. as was done in Western Australia and by burning up to 20% of the bush load annually, would reduce the scale and intensity of bushfires. Fuel loads in N.S.W.are presently the heaviest they have been since human occupation of the continent, and Aboriginal methods need to be adopted.
Reply
Guest on 22/10/2013 1:38am
Hahaha! CNN rubbish and fearmongering again eh.
I remember the huge fires in Aussie in 1983 but don’t recall any mention of CO2 emissions or Climate Change back then as being the cause.
May have been the fact that lightning or arsonists start the fires.
For god sakes – wakey wakey people.
Reply