Hi Mike,

I was waiting for someone to post this – not attacking you at all, as you’re asking the question, but I feel very passionately about this and people who react this way (not you – the people who you talk about) really annoy me.

This storm was bigger and more powerful than Hurricane Katrina.  We saw what Katrina did so we knew we were dealing with something more dangerous.  Firstly, the media didn’t do a beat up.  The media very accurately covered this system and in fact I’d argue that it took some media outlets a little too long to really get going on the coverage.

Let me address each point raised.

This storm would cause fatalities. (And again, my language will be strong – this is not attacking you, more so attacking those that would suggest this wasn’t a ‘real’ threat).  Nothing makes me more angry than hearing people who sound almost disappointed that there weren’t deaths.  As if to say that if someone was unfortunate enough to die then the forecasters/media/officials were right, but if no one dies then they were wrong and it was all "hype".   That same reasoning would be – if you don’t wear a seatbelt you are more likely to die in a car crash… then at the end of the year, when no one has died from not wearing their seatbelt, some in the public get annoyed with the media and government for screening ads like that because so far no one has died this year from not wearing their seatbelt.   

Have these people not seen the photos?  Entire towns have almost been wiped away.  Where the cyclone made landfall all of the trees in some areas were wiped out.    Remember these communities were completely evacuated.  There was pretty much no one left there to die.  

The storm also made landfall between two major cities – not over them.  Katrina killed so many in New Orleans because the storm hit the city.  While the models very accurately picked where this storm would make landfall, the margin of error with these systems is still fairly high.  A slight jog to the north or south and Cairns or Townsville would have suffered, quite literally, catastrophic damage.    One of the evacuations centres was evacuated itself as they felt it wouldn’t hold up to the storm…and it didn’t.  The building was completely destroyed.  If they had stayed there, there could have been many deaths.

The fact that no one died shows that we are intelligent and smart and knew what was coming and warned about it and we, for the most part, got out its way.

Another point raised – some locals say this was just a storm, they’ve experienced worse.  I believe that.  The thing with cyclones is that the most severe winds only cover a fairly small area – but that area is basically a "deadly wall of wind".  On the outsides of that core, it is just a windy, wet, system.  We saw a very tiny example of this with Wilma.  Northland was badly flooded – but just down the road in Auckland it was a non event.  So there will always be a large group of people within the warning zone that just get a bit of wind and rain.

In today’s New Zealand Herald cameraman Geoff Mackley – a well known camerman who frequently flies to where storms will make landfall to film them – said the noise of the wind as the core of the cyclone passed over them was earsplitting.

"It was louder than you could ever imagine. Louder than a jet engine taking off. Louder than anything really.

Mr Mackley has chased about 40 storms across New Zealand and Australia, but said being at the heart of Yasi was one of the most intense experiences he had had.

"This was right up there with the strongest I’ve ever been in. The doors blew out of the hotel and 300km/h winds were flying through the hotel reception area. We were in there, hiding in a small library off to the side of the main entrance, watching as stuff goes flying through. It was amazing."

He was in the heart of it.  Most people were not – they were told they had to evacuate.

With regards to the weather stations – again, remember the core of the storm is not huge.  It’s about 150kms, if that.  But the wide path – the distance of Auckland to Hamilton – is like a large scale tornado coming in.  Trees snapped in half (not even uprooted), houses removed from their foundations, boats blown around like paper bags, powerpoles snapped in half (imagine that strength).

There are only a small handful of weather stations in this part of Australia – between Cairns and Townsville isn’t so heavily populated.  The weather stations only record what is happening where they are – clearly none were in a position to record the highest winds.  Seeing the damage where Yasi made landfall, I have absolutely no doubt in my mind that the winds were around 300km/h when the cyclone made landfall.

Again Mike, thank you for bringing this up – you asked the question well and I hope you don’t take my reply as an attack on you – I just feel angry, sick to the stomach that people could think this was all just some sort of publicity stunt and blame the media and government and forecasters because there weren’t deaths, or any weather stations recording 300km/h winds (by the way, most weather stations would break before they got to that).  These would be the sort of moronic idiots that would ignore evacuation orders and then need help from emergency services in the middle of the night – or worse still, actually be killed.

Make no mistake – this was the most powerful storm to hit a populated part of Australia in living memory.  Rather than being angry that no one died (wow, why don’t they make placards and demand more deaths) they should celebrate the fact that no one did die and that the storm hit a less populated part.

It never ceases to amaze me that when a mircale happens there is a portion of people who are angry that things weren’t worse – just so they can feel better about the predictions.

Philip Duncan